The average golfer’s proclivity towards blade wedges has always been a curiosity. While maximum forgiveness has crept into every other type of club, and seeking that forgiveness has become commonplace, it’s not uncommon to see 20% of a typical amateur’s bag occupied with blade wedges. Not only do they lack the same perimeter weighting utilized from driver to putter, but they often possess soles that punish anything other than perfect contact. We could spend hours pontificating on the reason for this, but golfers are a finicky bunch and it’s hard to nail down solid rationale.
Cleveland Golf has long championed cavity back wedges for amateur swings, and their technological evolution has been quite remarkable. The CBX4, their newest offering in this space, takes an already solid platform and adds some key refinements that we found extremely useful in real-world scenarios with real-world swings (in all their imperfection).
Key Technologies – CBX4 Wedges
We talked about Cleveland’s dual identities in the equipment industry in our recent ZipCore XL iron review. They’ve managed to build a reputation for both Tour-level performance in wedges while still appealing to higher handicaps with the bulk of their line. The CBX4 brings these two identities closer together.
Cleveland really leans into the “anti-chunk” properties of their new wedges, which is reasonable when you consider both the target audience and sole design, but there is much more to the CBX4 line when it comes to technology.
HydraZip
Introduced on the RTX6 wedge in 2023, HydraZip is a fantastic technology that we’ll explore in greater depth later in the review. This face blast and laser milling applied to the face is designed to help players retain spin in wet conditions, which can occur almost anywhere at any time on a golf course.
Cleveland varies the pattern and roughness of the HydraZip treatment based on loft, as lower lofted wedges don’t need the same amount of friction as higher lofted ones.
ZipCore
ZipCore is increasingly ubiquitous in the Cleveland lineup now that it’s been introduced in the ZipCore XL irons, and most readers should already understand what it is. For those that don’t, weight is removed from the hosel and replaced with a lightweight, low-density core that allows the center of gravity to shift slightly toe-side of center. In conjunction with the Gelback insert and cavity, this works to improve feel and increases forgiveness. Cleveland shows the tangible benefits of ZipCore in the graphic posted above.
UtilZip
UtilZip is Cleveland’s proprietary groove pattern and it’s been a consistent winner for the company. They describe it as a tightly packed, “specialized sequence of sharper, deeper, and tighter grooves to provide ultimate short-game spin, control, consistency, and bite.”
Dynamic Sole Grinds
Specialized sole grinds have evolved from a custom option to an expected feature in a very short amount of time. While the highest level of sole customization is only available with the Tour Rack version of the RTX6 wedge, the CBX4 offers three different options, the V, S, and C soles. Each provides a different benefit, so Cleveland places each one of a different range of lofts. We’ll discuss the sole designs and how they perform later in the review.
Looks and Feel – CBX4 Wedges
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so your feelings may be different than ours, but we are here to give opinions. In what seems to be a general trend for Cleveland in 2024, the CBX4 offer a cleaner, more attractive look when compared to previous iterations of the line. The redesigned Gelback insert is probably most responsible for the improved looks. Rather than a black plastic interruption in the cavity, it’s now capped with a metallic finish that blends in more seamlessly with the rest of the club. While the feel benefits are still there (improved actually), we prefer it as a less-visible technology.
The CBX4 is obviously oversized compared to a blade wedge, which can be seen as a benefit or detriment, depending on your point of view. Where it really becomes a positive is how well these wedges blend into a game improvement iron set. Whether we are talking about Srixon’s ZX4 MKII irons or the new Cleveland ZipCore XL’S, the CBX4’s blend in perfectly with the PW when it comes to topline, blade size, and length.
With their familiar satin finish, the CBX4 wedges do a nice job of mitigating glare in the sun. New to the face is the aggressive face milling on the toe and the HyrdaZip blast, both of which inspire confidence that spin will be plentiful and easy to come by.
Another aspect we feel has improved (again, a very subjective area) from previous Cleveland cavity back wedges is the feel and sound at impact. Before diving in too deep, it’s important to note that the CBX4 feel very different than the blade RTX6 line. RTX6 wedges tend to be more solid and responsive, which should be expected given the design. However, some of the almost “artificial” softness or muted sounds noticed in earlier versions of the CBX line seems to have been lessened, giving them a bit denser feel with more feedback. Make no mistake – these wedges will still feel like cavity backs, but we’d be hard pressed to suggest one that feels better.
On Course Performance – CBX4 Wedges
One of the most common tropes we hear regarding wedges like the CBX4 is that they limit creativity or imagination around the greens. While it would be easy to argue most greenside creativity isn’t all that necessary, or even creative, it does necessitate testing.
In November 2023, twelve THP forum members converged on Briggs Ranch in San Antonio, TX as participants in the Srixon Experience. At that time, each person was given a CBX4 wedge to test over the course of 54 holes of golf and then take home, making them among the very first people in North America to see the new line. Other than that whole thing just being cool, it offered a unique opportunity to really put the CBX4 line to the test. Briggs Ranch, a Dormie Network property, is classic Texas Hill Country golf. The Zoysia fairways are firm, fast, and tight, and the TifEagle Bermuda greens and surrounds offer their own challenges.
We admit having some early trepidation. The internet and its anecdotes can be persuasive, and the idea of using a wider sole and larger blade in these conditions seemed like it would never work. What we found was the complete opposite though. I personally had the 50, 54, and 58 degree versions in the bag. As noted earlier, and detailed later in the specifications chart, each of these lofts has its own grind designed to maximize performance based on its most conventional uses. The 50 degree wedge’s V sole made full swings more forgiving by mitigating heavy contact and encouraging clean strikes on full swings. The 54 (S grind) was great for partial swings and pitches, even off very tight lies, and I had no difficulty varying trajectory. The 58 (C grind) was equally good as the 54 in those situations, but also great with open-face shots.
The ease with which clean, solid contact and spin came on tight lies was a bit humbling because it flew in the face of what I felt like I knew about wedges. It shouldn’t have been that easy. Will a standard blade wedge like the RTX6 offer some added versatility? Probably for some people, but maybe not for as many people or to as high a degree as conventional wisdom may suggest. I did notice some challenges adjusting the wider sole in the sand, though that appeared to be a fitting issue, as other players didn’t seem to have the same problems.
Hydrazip Performance
While technological advancements are often nuanced, Hydrazip appears to offer a pleasantly glaring example of how the brains at golf companies can help our games. To test Hydrazip’s performance, we conducted a simple test using the new Srixon Q Star Tour golf ball. We used identically lofted CBX4 and CBX ZipCore wedges (54 degrees) and repeatedly soaked the face immediately before hitting ¾ shots on the SkyTrak+. Though finding a perfectly controlled environment is impossible, especially considering the variability in “average” golf swings, we took great care to replicate the same conditions with each shot. For example, the same method of wetting the face was used before each swing, the ball was placed the same way in front of the camera, and so on. What we found was nothing short of exciting.
Club Speed | Ball Speed | Launch Angle | Spin | Carry | Total | |
CBX ZipCore | 62 | 72 mph | 30 degrees | 6,894 rpm | 84 yards | 85 yards |
CBX4 | 62 | 74 mph | 28 degrees | 7,389 rpm | 87 yards | 87 yards |
To quickly summarize, that’s almost a 500rpm, or 7%, increase in spin with the CBX4’s application of Hydrazip, an astounding figure no matter how you look at it. What doesn’t show in the averages is the increased consistency seen from shot to shot with the CBX4. While we saw quite a variation in carry distances with the CBX ZipCore, 9 yards from the shortest to the longest shot, the CBX4 narrowed that down to 4 yards, more than a 50% improvement.
Details and Specifications – CBX4 Wedges
CBX4 wedges are available in nine different lofts for men and seven for women. The stock steel shaft is the 115g KBS Hi-Rev 2.0, which performed and felt great, and the stock graphite option is the UST Mamiya Recoil Dart 80.
- Available January 24, 2024.
- $169 Steel/$179 Graphite
- Custom paint fill and engraving is available via custom order.
For more information, check out Cleveland’s website at us.dunlopsports.com/cleveland-golf.
Does someone have side by side pictures of CBX4 vs. RTX6? I’m interested to see differences at address in their footprint.
The footprint at address is way closer than I expected
[QUOTE=”baylrballa, post: 12080491, member: 52381″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_3767.jpeg”]9236840[/ATTACH][ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_3761.jpeg”]9236841[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_3765.jpeg”]9236843[/ATTACH]
[/QUOTE]
Waiting out a softball practice last night, so I hit a pitching area and worked on everything I could. Flat, uphill, downhill, bare, rough, fluffy. All of it. First real practice like this on grass for 2024 and my results ranged from amazing to awful. About what you’d expect I guess.
I was setting up in the 25-35 yard range.
While I was hitting a dozen balls off a bare lie (which is easily my least favorite wedge shot) and not dominating like my feeble brain expected, I had a thought. I looked at the green and noticed 11 balls on the green and one on the fringe. Five in a decently makable range, and the rest in the 15-30 foot range. Not great, right? Maybe I’m just a perpetual optimist, but I realized I’d made truly solid contact on about 2 of these shots. Not one of the bad swings dug and saw the ball die before it got to the green. A few were toe side and better than most. A few I slid into the ball and managed to get the ball on the green.
In a game where a guy like me is hoping for par and really just aiming for bogey on many holes, I suppose that’s kind of why I’m playing these things.
CBX4 may be moving along after my round last night. Loved them at the range off of mats but hit almost every shot, whether full swing or partial, fat last night during my round. I have never had such an issue as I did last night and was ready to snap both wedges.
I was hitting everything else very well and by the end of the round I started to hit partial shots and chips with my PXG Gen6 0311P GW rather than the CBX4 54 or 58.
No idea why as I had previously played CBX ZipCore in 56/60 last year for a good portion of the season and enjoyed them.
Will be taking my Vokeys out next round to see how they work to compare.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12263808, member: 1193″]
Waiting out a softball practice last night, so I hit a pitching area and worked on everything I could. Flat, uphill, downhill, bare, rough, fluffy. All of it. First real practice like this on grass for 2024 and my results ranged from amazing to awful. About what you’d expect I guess.
I was setting up in the 25-35 yard range.
While I was hitting a dozen balls off a bare lie (which is easily my least favorite wedge shot) and not dominating like my feeble brain expected, I had a thought. I looked at the green and noticed 11 balls on the green and one on the fringe. Five in a decently makable range, and the rest in the 15-30 foot range. Not great, right? Maybe I’m just a perpetual optimist, but I realized I’d made truly solid contact on about 2 of these shots. Not one of the bad swings dug and saw the ball die before it got to the green. A few were toe side and better than most. A few I slid into the ball and managed to get the ball on the green.
In a game where a guy like me is hoping for par and really just aiming for bogey on many holes, I suppose that’s kind of why I’m playing these things.
[/QUOTE]
Good to hear that they can more or less handle bare dirt lies as I get some of those through the late summer months.
The 54 is in hand! And after hitting a bunch of pitches in the bay I went ahead and ordered a GW and LW to match. Pretty excited about having them in the bag. Need to get them all to the range to dial in my matrix.
[QUOTE=”radeon962, post: 12264391, member: 18461″]
CBX4 may be moving along after my round last night. Loved them at the range off of mats but hit almost every shot, whether full swing or partial, fat last night during my round. I have never had such an issue as I did last night and was ready to snap both wedges.
I was hitting everything else very well and by the end of the round I started to hit partial shots and chips with my PXG Gen6 0311P GW rather than the CBX4 54 or 58.
No idea why as I had previously played CBX ZipCore in 56/60 last year for a good portion of the season and enjoyed them.
Will be taking my Vokeys out next round to see how they work to compare.
[/QUOTE]
I could totally relate and the wide sole just doesn’t fit into my wanting to control trajectory with a little wrist action the Vokey or RTX 6 was better for that.
[QUOTE=”JDax, post: 12257291, member: 22002″]
I have the 50° CBX4 in the bag w/ Recoil Dart 105. And after one round, it like my favorite club in the bag. The bounce makes it easy to hit bump & runs when you come up short of the green. And on 3/4 & full swings, this club is money.
This might be recency bias, but this head and shaft combo feels great, and so far I’m glad I went with this wedge instead of the set AW.
[/QUOTE]
[ATTACH type=”full”]9256601[/ATTACH]
The arsenal is set… CBX4 50° RTX6 54° & 58°
[QUOTE=”JDax, post: 12272908, member: 22002″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_2135.jpeg”]9256601[/ATTACH]
The arsenal is set… CBX4 50° RTX6 54° & 58°
[/QUOTE]
Lovely.
[QUOTE=”JDax, post: 12272908, member: 22002″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_2135.jpeg”]9256601[/ATTACH]
The arsenal is set… CBX4 50° RTX6 54° & 58°
[/QUOTE]
You are spicy with those RTX. My RTX 58 Will be hanging jn the wings but I’m going to start with full on CBX first. I think their sole work will be more than adequate for my game.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 12272984, member: 62865″]
You are spicy with those RTX. My RTX 58 Will be hanging jn the wings but I’m going to start with full on CBX first. I think their sole work will be more than adequate for my game.
[/QUOTE]
I like saucy.
Cleveland has pulled quite the trick to design a sole that can protect me from the fats ones on the range yet also lets me slide the club under for a saucy little chip.
I’m really excited to see how this year goes with a set of these in the bag.
[QUOTE=”JDax, post: 12272908, member: 22002″]
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_2135.jpeg”]9256601[/ATTACH]
The arsenal is set… CBX4 50° RTX6 54° & 58°
[/QUOTE]
Exactly what I want – but cannot figure out the grind/bounce combo on the RTX6.
I went Mid 54° Low 58°
[QUOTE=”RatFink, post: 12281304, member: 3557″]
Exactly what I want – but cannot figure out the grind/bounce combo on the RTX6.
[/QUOTE]
You know, I read these reviews, understand them, give a thumbs up, and then fail retain the information when it matters.
I’ve had so much success with the first CBX wedge I received a few years ago that I decided to buy additional ones with varying lofts. I talked to the manager at my club who sells Cleveland products. I showed him my 60° CBX and he erroneously told me the RTX wedges he sells are the same thing, just newer. He then loaned me his personal RTXs to demo on the rounds. After hitting nice shots with them during the front 9, I went ahead and purchased the 52°. After getting home, I realized there is a difference between the models, and for me, that difference is significant. Now that I realize this, I can’t get it out of my head. And confidence – or lack thereof – is a huge deal for me.
While I had success with the 52° RTX during the round and practice afterwards, it is not as easy to hit. I have to either get use to the new wedge, or find someone with a similarly lofted CBX willing to trade for it.
My short game is better than the rest of my game – which is to say it might be average compared to the rest of golfing population (SG says my short game is that of a 10 capper). But my “superpower” is not in hitting the wedges perfectly and getting great contact, it’s in the feel of knowing where to land the shot and how much of a partial swing to put on the ball. Success from that skill comes only when decent contact is accomplished.
[QUOTE=”JonMA1, post: 12281372, member: 45770″]
You know, I read these reviews, understand them, give a thumbs up, and then fail retain the information when it matters.
I’ve had so much success with the first CBX wedge I received a few years ago that I decided to buy additional ones with varying lofts. I talked to the manager at my club who sells Cleveland products. I showed him my 60° CBX and he erroneously told me the RTX wedges he sells are the same thing, just newer. He then loaned me his personal RTXs to demo on the rounds. After hitting nice shots with them during the front 9, I went ahead and purchased the 52°. After getting home, I realized there is a difference between the models, and for me, that difference is significant. Now that I realize this, I can’t get it out of my head. And confidence – or lack thereof – is a huge deal for me.
While I had success with the 52° RTX during the round and practice afterwards, it is not as easy to hit. I have to either get use to the new wedge, or find someone with a similarly lofted CBX willing to trade for it.
My short game is better than the rest of my game – which is to say it might be average compared to the rest of golfing population (SG says my short game is that of a 10 capper). But my “superpower” is not in hitting the wedges perfectly and getting great contact, it’s in the feel of knowing where to land the shot and how much of a partial swing to put on the ball. Success from that skill comes only when decent contact is accomplished.
[/QUOTE]
That’s a bummer. Yes, quite a substantial difference in about every single way.
First round with the CBX4 and I’m pretty smitten. Had three shots right at 100 and I was all over the number. The pitch shots had the right distance as well and plenty of workability around the green. A few had line issues but that’s on me. Shot Scope had me at a +2.3 strokes against a 5 handicapper so these are not just for high caps golfers.
Plus, these are so soft! They feel really good.
This was my face after warmup, justifying my choice for the season:
[ATTACH type=”full”]9257443[/ATTACH]
I didn’t hit this 50° a lot today, but when I did it performed extremely well. On tight lies like here Briggs Ranch, you just can’t decelerate and commit to get the desired results.
After reading through the reviews, I’m definitely going to pick up a 54 and 58. I’m pretty set on mid bounce for my 54, but what would you guys recommend for my 58? My home course has firm bermuda fairways, and I’m not the best out of bunkers.
[QUOTE=”Clutch42, post: 12285640, member: 21080″]
After reading through the reviews, I’m definitely going to pick up a 54 and 58. I’m pretty set on mid bounce for my 54, but what would you guys recommend for my 58? My home course has firm bermuda fairways, and I’m not the best out of bunkers.
[/QUOTE]
The CBX4 wedges only come with one bounce/grind per loft. That said, I played earlier this year with a CBX4 on firmer winter ground and didn’t have many issues.
Do you engage the bounce with your wedges? If so I think a CBX4 would work at a 58 deg spot. If you like low bounce wedges the RTX wedges may be more towards your liking.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 12285709, member: 62865″]
The CBX4 wedges only come with one bounce/grind per loft. That said, I played earlier this year with a CBX4 on firmer winter ground and didn’t have many issues.
Do you engage the bounce with your wedges? If so I think a CBX4 would work at a 58 deg spot. If you like low bounce wedges the RTX wedges may be more towards your liking.
[/QUOTE]
That’s right, I’ve been looking at so many wedges of late I forgot about that. I’ll probably go with 54 and 58 in the CBX4.
Thanks
Really enjoying the 54 right now. Seemingly every approach or pitch was going right on the number. Makes for boring, simple golf which is good golf.
I did miss one shot today with it. Had a probably 20 yard pitch into and elevates green that then ran away. Best play is to die it into the hillside and let it trickle on if you want to get close to a front pin (Or just lob it high, and watch it roll out for a 20’ putt…)
Trying to put it through its paces, it felt that I hit a good one but the ball seemed to come out hotter and higher than I expected. Certainly could have been me but felt like the right strike. Going to work on this more lower shot here shortly
Another day of hitting my number with the CBX4 on full-ish swings. I’m either on a heater or becoming a believer in the performance of these.
I did underestimate how well the sole can move through a bunker. I thought with the bigger footprint I wouldnt be able to slap the sand like I do with a RTX. I was completely wrong as it was able to work though the same brilliantly.
My custom ordered 56 finally showed up the other day. Haven’t played it yet on the course, but been able to spend a few hours with it chipping around my backyard. Loving it thus far!
There continues to be a theme of hitting one somewhere not ideal on the face and hitting my number. It’s a lot of fun.
I’ve own and played every cbx wedge love the first one the best and still have it but this model is really good feels little lighter than the first you can do everything you need with these wedges bump and run or open and go high I have the 54 and no need for a 60 I’m not wedge guy but with these I can do a lot of things I couldn’t before
I don’t think I could have hit these any worse last week if I’d tried ? Just a truly spectacular failure of my short game ability in every way. No wedge in the world could have saved me from myself.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12297681, member: 1193″]
I don’t think I could have hit these any worse last week if I’d tried ? Just a truly spectacular failure of my short game ability in every way. No wedge in the world could have saved me from myself.
[/QUOTE]
Why you need bring logic to this? :ROFLMAO:
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 12297790, member: 62865″]
Why you need bring logic to this? :ROFLMAO:
[/QUOTE]
It was so, so bad. I actually had a fantastic range session and initial short game area warmup. Feeling amazing about it. Then somewhere in the middle of my first round I hit a straight toe-shank and it was gone. I ended up just using the putter for everything inside 60 yards lol. Stupid golf.
Anyone playing these in the stronger lofts? If the consistency I am seeing with the 54 continues with the 50 I will be giving a long look at something in the 40’s.
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 12301551, member: 62865″]
Anyone playing these in the stronger lofts? If the consistency I am seeing with the 54 continues with the 50 I will be giving a long look at something in the 40’s.
[/QUOTE]
My ZX5 PW is 44*. I have a 48* CBX4 that’s perfect for gapping. As I use it mostly as a full swing club- then my 52 and 56 for short game work…
The only thing I might have changed was getting the same shaft as my PW – as it’s mostly a full swing club.
A little bit of chipping action tonight to get used to the 50 deg. It doesn’t present big behind the ball at all imho.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_8342.jpeg”]9260405[/ATTACH]
Although if I keep this strike point I should have gone RTX…
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_8343.jpeg”]9260406[/ATTACH]
(spoiler: I can’t, lol)
[QUOTE=”Scooby45, post: 12302873, member: 62865″]
A little bit of chipping action tonight to get used to the 50 deg. It doesn’t present big behind the ball at all imho.
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_8342.jpeg”]9260405[/ATTACH]
Although if I keep this strike point I should have gone RTX…
[ATTACH type=”full” alt=”IMG_8343.jpeg”]9260406[/ATTACH]
(spoiler: I can’t, lol)
[/QUOTE]
These things look so nice brand new.
[QUOTE=”Hawk, post: 12303693, member: 1193″]
These things look so nice brand new.
[/QUOTE]
right? this iteration was so well done from a look and feel perspective
Been a long time Vokey user. I recently switched to more of a GI iron (which has done wonders for my game) and thinking of using 48 and 54 degree GI wedges. I just drop off too much on a less than perfect swing with my SM10 wedges. There are so many versions of the CBX and some with full face. I worry how they are in tight fairway lies with the thicker soles. Looking for feedback on this and what version do you recommend and why? Also, how are they on distance control with full shots, three quarter shots, punch shots, and low spinners. Can you open up a 54 play it back in your stance and hit a two hopper that stops? Is their toe relief to raise hands and hit the short chips? How are they from bunkers?