The Rapid Taper shaft from Robin Arthur and his Xcaliber brand has been an interesting one to keep up with. Their performance potential is well documented on THP with our reviews of both the RTI 105 shafts (here: Xcaliber Rapid Taper 105 Iron Shaft Review – The Hackers Paradise) as well as some of the lighter weight options (here: XCaliber Rapid Taper Iron Shaft Review – The Hackers Paradise). Today though, it is the wedge which we are here to talk about, specifically the Xcaliber RTI 100S and 115S+ wedge shafts.
Quick Take
While THP has well documented the energy efficiency of the Rapid Taper design from Xcaliber for years now, the dedicated RTI Wedge designs eschew that for more stability and spin potential. While we didn’t see the thousands of RPM’s which the company claims possible, there was a worthwhile increase accompanied by extreme stability.
Rapid Taper Technology
If you want a super detailed rundown of the tech, I urge you to take the time to look at the previous reviews which are linked up above. However, a quick breakdown of the technology is still worthwhile here as well.
The idea behind Rapid Taper came from Robin Arthur, founder of Xcaliber, thinking about how a bullwhip is designed and functions. There is a distinct transfer of energy from the buildup, the flow, and then release, much of which comes from the tapered shape of the whip. That is where the unique shape of the Rapid Taper comes from, to mimic that look and thus obtain similar benefits.
This design in wedges is perhaps the most intriguing application, particularly when it comes to stiffness, but more on that soon.
Rapid Taper Wedge Shaft Performance
I have been able to review the Rapid Taper design many times now, and I will be honest, the performance has always shocked me in irons and utilities. There is an efficiency with the RTI shafts that shows out time and again when put on a launch monitor. It is for that reason when I found out we would be getting the RTI Wedge 100S and 115S+shafts in, I got curious, especially with some of the claims from Xcaliber.
I elected to install each in a different brand and design of wedge for this review. The lighter 100S went into a Mizuno T24 54 while the 115S was installed into a more specialty design in the Cleveland Full Face 2 58. However, before installation I took both shafts to the frequency analyzer and tested their CPM ratings to see how the actual flex rating compared to the stated one. Interestingly, for me the Rapid Taper shafts have always played a bit firm to stated flex, so I thought the wedge shafts might be even more so. According to the CPM ratings, they were, and then some with both situating within X rather than S.
As it turns out, the frequency analyzer wasn’t lying, when I got these onto the course as well as the monitor, they were all there. The best way that I can describe it in anything other than a full swing is connected. On partial swings all the way down to chips, both RTI wedge shafts were stout enough that it feels practically like the hands are connected directly to the head. More interesting though, was in full swings, they still felt very stable but some of the energy of the Rapid Taper iron variations peaked through.
On the course, the RTI Wedge shafts allowed each of the two wedge heads to do the same things which I demand of their specific designs for my game, there was no drop off in versatility, but there was a change in bite into greens. The only way to test that of course was on a launch monitor where I hit each wedge with its stock steel shaft and the RTI Wedge shafts from 50 and 80 yards as well as full swings. One of the talking points for Xcaliber on these includes the potential gain of “up to” 2,000 RPM more.
Mizuno T24 54 | TARGET | BALL SPEED | LAUNCH | SPIN | CARRY | TOTAL | HEIGHT |
Stock Steel | 50Y | 55 | 27 | 5865 | 53 | 54 | 8Y |
RTI Wedge 100S | 50Y | 54 | 27 | 6675 | 52 | 52 | 8Y |
Mizuno T24 54 | TARGET | BALL SPEED | LAUNCH | SPIN | CARRY | TOTAL | HEIGHT |
Stock Steel | 80Y | 68 | 26 | 7243 | 77 | 77 | 13Y |
RTI Wedge 100S | 80Y | 67 | 26 | 7493 | 75 | 75 | 13Y |
Mizuno T24 54 | TARGET | BALL SPEED | LAUNCH | SPIN | CARRY | TOTAL | HEIGHT |
Stock Steel | Full | 94 | 27 | 9912 | 115 | 114 | 30Y |
RTI Wedge 100S | Full | 95 | 28 | 10281 | 114 | 113 | 31Y |
As you can see in both sets of data, 2,000 RPM wasn’t seen by me, but there was an increase in every single head-to-head done between the stock shaft and RTI Wedge’s. How much will a few hundred RPM’s difference make? Clearly that depends on the golfer, but there is also the increased overall launch and peak height to take into consideration. What surprised me was the standout of the two designs for my swing was the 115S+, that was by far the most stout of the two.
Cleveland Full Face 2 58 | TARGET | BALL SPEED | LAUNCH | SPIN | CARRY | TOTAL | HEIGHT |
Stock Steel | 50Y | 55 | 28 | 6519 | 53 | 54 | 8Y |
RTI Wedge 115S+ | 50Y | 55 | 31 | 7513 | 54 | 54 | 11Y |
Cleveland Full Face 2 58 | TARGET | BALL SPEED | LAUNCH | SPIN | CARRY | TOTAL | HEIGHT |
Stock Steel | 80Y | 68 | 26 | 8196 | 77 | 77 | 14Y |
RTI Wedge 115S+ | 80Y | 69 | 28 | 8871 | 78 | 77 | 16Y |
Cleveland Full Face 2 58 | TARGET | BALL SPEED | LAUNCH | SPIN | CARRY | TOTAL | HEIGHT |
Stock Steel | Full | 86 | 27 | 10251 | 102 | 101 | 25Y |
RTI Wedge 115S+ | Full | 89 | 30 | 10690 | 104 | 102 | 29Y |
The Details – XCaliber Rapid Taper Wedge Shafts
While they may not be as flashy in their performance jumps as their Rapid Taper iron siblings, there is enough here to at least bring some intrigue. That said, if you are someone who likes a bit more flow in their wedge shafts, it might be worth considering the RTI Wedge 85 version.
The Xcaliber RTI Wedge shafts are priced at $49.99 and are available at fitters across the United States as well as direct from xcalibershafts.com.
Good article and some intrigue is there. The RT line seems to work well for you [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER]
Interesting numbers. Yeah they do spin more and shows the stopping power in carry/total but is the difference enough to make a switch? I wonder with my ball striking if it could help. I’m doubtful other than feel.
I’ve been using the RT wedge shafts in all my wedge sets for the last 2 years, and they perform very well. They are, smooth, consistent, and spinny enough for me. I play the RT100S in the wedges and RTi 95s in my irons. I am very happy with them. I order new shafts for all my wedges and spine-flow them at home.
As always good write up [USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] . The price immediately jumped out at me, doesn’t seem like it’s a barrier to giving these a whirl. They aren’t exorbitantly priced and I do enjoy the graphics. Fully admit, I typically play the same shafts in my wedges as my irons but that’s more out of lack of knowledge than preference.
The numbers don’t lie, there’s a noticeable difference for you specifically. Something to ponder for certain in my next set.
I don’t think I’d think much about 300 rpms on a full swing (all else being equal), but 1000 on a 50 yard shot is pretty interesting
Interesting results, especially showing an increase in spin, launch & height with the 115.
I haven’t moved to the wedge shafts yet, still enjoying the tipping I did with the 105 S+ I did with my wedges.
I do think that folks looking for help with launch & spin in their irons, & now a designated wedge shaft should give these a go. Agreed they’re not for everyone but the feel & forgiveness is something to be tried.
While the increase in spin isn’t mind-blowingly high, it’s enough to build some interest and the price is pretty reasonable to boot.
[QUOTE=”willplaysgolf, post: 12286103, member: 61852″]
I don’t think I’d think much about 300 rpms on a full swing (all else being equal), but 1000 on a 50 yard shot is pretty interesting
[/QUOTE]
It’s a lot on those shorties for sure. It’s just interesting how much more stout they play than the RT iron shafts.
[QUOTE=”shanewu, post: 12287737, member: 38120″]
While the increase in spin isn’t mind-blowingly high, it’s enough to build some interest and the price is pretty reasonable to boot.
[/QUOTE]
I agree honestly, and the price isn’t crazy, that helps.
The issue I think will remain access more than anything, most will have to take an online flier. Which hey, we golfers here on the internet are definitely not scared of doing haha
Great write up as always. I have a set of 100s shafts in closet waiting for me to select new wedges to put them in.
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] the link to the iron shaft review isn’t working – is that just me? Just learning about this company and am curious to read. Cheers
[QUOTE=”edelguy, post: 12288230, member: 60735″]
[USER=1579]@Jman[/USER] the link to the iron shaft review isn’t working – is that just me? Just learning about this company and am curious to read. Cheers
[/QUOTE]
Well, darn.
Just hop to the homepage and search XCaliber, they should both pop up as well as some other things about the brand! We will get that fixed, I’m pretty positive I messed up the link I sent in my article.
Great article, almost the same carry distance with a big jump in spin between these and the stock steel, is eye opening.
JMan is right re the spin increase with the RTI-W115-Ss. The numbers I’ve reported for a while now was from my initial player testing with 3 of Shenandoah U’s golf team. We tested quite a few of my original “spinner” designs which “the winner spinner”….Geez I had to say that eh…realized those kinda numbers when we tested against the Rifle and TT “spinners”. The spin increase is definitely there but also def decreases as the weight goes up. Guess I need to tame that claim down eh? 😉
What JMan didn’t report was the angle of decent. What we found time n time again was the decent angle was definitely steeper than all the steel shafts for a majority of the different golfers whom we worked with. SO…..hmmm…if the spin is increased and the angle down is steeper…that combo just might help someone maybe check up a little white orb on that green area – something they’ve never been able to do before…
A special call-out to Popeye for all his help especially with the 115 gm version!!
One more note which really exemplifies this industry’s BS innuendos and out-right fabrications… the original “spinner” shafts were nothing more than a std steel shaft tipped to a #8 iron’s parallel. Now if a shaft has a longer parallel doesn’t it stand to reason that shaft just might have a bit more spin?? And those claims and false technology resulted in folks paying more money for a spinner (smart fitters/clubmakers knew this and made their own!). Now that this new co we’re building (more on that later) I’m going to blow away some more industry BS…for ex how much my Phoenix 6 TS and S ($135) designs’ stiffness distribution are practically Identical to Fuji’s new Fuji Ventas Blue Velocore 6… Stay tuned folks
Robin